It’s been a while since I’ve posted here, mostly since my treatment has been stable (thank goodness) and I’ve been doing what chronic cancer patients dream of doing: living. However, I’m not speaking about just myself today. This is far more important.
The impact of the overturn of Roe vs. Wade on the cancer community cannot be overstated. While there are many lenses through which one can examine this issue, I am choosing to share it through my own cancer experience and those of my community.
To quote Dr. Elonora Teplinsky, a medical oncologist at Valley Hospital in New Jersey, “cancer during pregnancy occurs approximately once per 1,000 pregnancies annually… While many cancer treatments can be safely done during pregnancy, many cannot be such as chemotherapy during the first trimester (and certain chemo agents during the whole pregnancy), radiation, endocrine therapy, and some targeted therapies. The SCOTUS decision will affect our ability to give necessary treatments for the health and life of the mother.” (Source).
In short, the upending of Roe means that women facing cancer who become pregnant will die. Not all of them. But many. The law is so unclear that most medical providers not making abortion accommodations for cancer care. As a recent NPR interview summarized, “Dr. Lisa Harris is an OB-GYN at the University of Michigan who’s been working on a task force to prepare for the possibility that the state’s 1931 abortion ban takes effect. That law would make abortion a felony except, quote, ‘to preserve the life of the pregnant woman.’ She says that language is incredibly unclear… Sometimes pregnancy hormones make cancer spread faster, or treatment isn’t safe to start during pregnancy. If abortion is not an option for patients in this situation, they may have to carry their pregnancy to term and delay crucial treatment… That might mean their cancer is more serious and more widespread than early in the pregnancy, and so they may indeed have a higher risk of dying, but it’s not a risk that’s going to happen immediately and might be a recurrence in months or years.” (Source: NPR). In an article in the Houston Chronicle, one woman named Sarah Morris shared her story which falls in this situation. She was diagnosed with cervical cancer at 10 weeks pregnant, and while she wants the baby, she is in fear of her life. “Though the law makes an exception for medical emergencies, Morris said her doctor told her its definition leaves a lot up to interpretation, so she would perform abortions only on patients who were bleeding out or in other obvious life-or-death situations.” You can read that full article here.
In addition to the loss of bodily autonomy and a constitutional right, it puts so much else up next: including fertility treatments. There are already states with “trigger laws” in place, where the law defines that life begins at conception. This grants seemingly full personhood to a frozen embryo created through a process like IVF. As I write, fertility doctors across the country are working to move embryos created through science to states where personhood laws are not in place. It’s important to note that this act alone can cause damage to the created embryos that patients have likely spent thousands of dollars, and so much personal heartache, to create. (source: WSJ).
In 2019, I made the choice to freeze my eggs before beginning Doxil infusions for my desmoid tumor. Insurance covered nothing of this process, and it cost several thousand dollars, even with assistance from the Livestrong Foundation, which covered most of my pre-retrieval medications. (You can read my posts here). If I had a partner at that time, I would have chosen to freeze embryos. Because cancer should not dictate a reproductive path for individuals or families.
But here we are.
You may not consider yourself a political person. But like it or not: the personal IS political. And as a woman with cancer, this ruling is undeniably personal.
If you feel that this ruling is not personal to you: I urge you to look at the life circumstances that prevent you from feeling that impact at this time. But remember: regardless of what you consider, cancer does not play fair. It strikes down people across party lines. It is no more a moral failing than any other personal tragedy.
Whether an egg is fertilized in a laboratory or through sexual intercourse: the decision on how to proceed should rest with the person carrying it alone.
My heart is with all who lost a constitutional right last week and those who love them: especially my beloved cancer community, who has already endured the loss of control over their body through their diagnosis.
Please take care of yourself, as best you can, however you are able.
1 thought on “A Word – Or, Many – On Roe and Cancer.”
So well written, Christina. I am heartsick over the SC decision, and angry. But ready to fight. AGAIN!